Skip to the reads

Bonus offers · Daily read

Why Most Casino Bonuses Have Low Table Game Contributions

A bonus might count 100% toward slot requirements but only 5% toward table game requirements. This is not accidental.

By Neil Harper, 2 min read

ALMANAC ENTRYBC365

Day256

Entered under Bonus offers.

bonus contribution percentage matrix showing table game weighting disparity and requirement asymmetry

I am at the 2024 WSOP covering the bracelet events. A player mentions they are taking advantage of a $1,000 bonus at BetMGM. I ask if he has checked the contribution rates. He has not. His eyes glaze when I explain that his table game play only counts 5% toward the playthrough requirement. He just realized he would need to play $200,000 at the table to clear a $1,000 bonus.

Bonus structure is where casinos hide the real terms. A $1,000 bonus sounds great until you read the fine print. The contribution percentage determines whether the bonus is valuable or worthless.

A typical bonus structure:

  • Slots: 100% contribution
  • Table games: 5-25% contribution
  • Live dealer: 5-10% contribution
  • Video poker: 50% contribution

This means if you want to clear a $1,000 bonus playing table games exclusively, you need to generate $20,000 in wagering (1,000 divided by 0.05) at a 5% contribution rate. If you want to clear the same bonus on slots, you need to generate $1,000 in wagering. The difference is massive.

Why This Happens

The house edge on slots is 2-4%. The house edge on table games is 0.5-2% (if you play with perfect strategy). Casinos make more profit from slots because the edge is higher and the turnover is faster.

A bonus that counts 100% toward slots and only 5% toward tables is essentially saying, "Play slots and we will give you our profit. Play table games and you have to earn the bonus through five times as much play." It is a way of steering bonus recipients toward the games where the casino makes the most money.

The playthrough requirement is how the casino calculates the bonus's cost. A $1,000 bonus with a $20,000 playthrough requirement and a 1% house edge costs the casino $200 in expected losses. But the player might think the bonus is free money without understanding the playthrough.

"A bonus that sounds generous often pays for itself through the difference in contribution rates. You are not getting free money. You are getting paid to play games with worse odds."

The live dealer table games are in the middle. They have higher contribution percentages than physical table games (maybe 10-20%) but lower than slots. This is because live dealers have higher operating costs than RNG slots, so the casino needs more action to justify the bonus.

Some casinos advertise bonuses as "no playthrough on table games." This is a selling point. But the catch is that the bonus itself might be smaller or the terms more restrictive.

The cash bonus, which is immediately available without playthrough requirements, is the rarest type. Most bonuses require playthrough. The playthrough is designed to give the casino expected profit equal to or greater than the bonus amount.

For a player interested in claiming bonuses, the math is: (bonus amount) divided by (contribution percentage for your preferred game) equals your required wagering. If the product of your required wagering and the house edge is less than the bonus amount, the bonus has positive value. If it is greater, the bonus has negative value despite its appearance.

End of the entry for Day 256

Send this read